[CWB] a question regarding the keywords analysis in CQPweb

[Ray Wu]

Hmm, got it. After a more careful thinking, I think your rationale is sound and more logical than I thought.


Best,
Ray


At 2013-10-31 20:46:41,"Hardie, Andrew" <a.hardie at lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:


I copied this aspect of the user interface. But I imagine I think the rationale was probably: Because if you want words in list 1 that don’t occur at all in list 2, then you’ve got the “compare frequency lists” function on the same screen.

 

Happy to change it if there’s a general feeling that being able to go down to zero would be useful.

 

best

 

Andrew.

 

From:cwb-bounces at sslmit.unibo.it [mailto:cwb-bounces at sslmit.unibo.it] On Behalf Of Ray Wu
Sent: 31 October 2013 12:29
To:cwb at sslmit.unibo.it
Subject: [CWB] a question regarding the keywords analysis in CQPweb

 

Dear members,

It is known that currently CQPweb sets a "Min freq"  constraint for keyword analysis.  Isn't it possible that "Min freq (list 2):" could be zero in some cases? Why should the lowest number of "Min freq (list 2):" be set to 1 instead of zero?

Thanks for any pointers to relevant literature.

Best,
Ray

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://devel.sslmit.unibo.it/pipermail/cwb/attachments/20131031/a24ce6c6/attachment.html>