[CWB] Problem granting privileges

[Hardie, Andrew]

Currently yes, based on my own use pattern where I often delete a corpus when something has gone wrong in creation and re-index it, it’s then convenient to have the privileges persist across deletion. But I would be open to changing this if general sentiment is that automatic removal would be better.

best

Andrew.

From: cwb-bounces at sslmit.unibo.it [mailto:cwb-bounces at sslmit.unibo.it] On Behalf Of Jiayue Wang
Sent: 03 October 2017 02:58
To: Open source development of the Corpus WorkBench
Subject: Re: [CWB] Problem granting privileges

Thanks Andrew, I get your point. On the other hand, after a few old corpora were removed, their privileges are still there in the list, even after I told CQPweb to auto-generate privileges again. So the no longer needed privileges must be deleted manually, right?
Best
Jiayue

On 3 October 2017 at 01:26, Stefan Evert <stefanML at collocations.de<mailto:stefanML at collocations.de>> wrote:

> On 2 Oct 2017, at 14:31, Hardie, Andrew <a.hardie at lancaster.ac.uk<mailto:a.hardie at lancaster.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
>  Often, it might be better to add the new corpus to the scope of existing privileges. (This is especially the case when you have lots of corpora).

Oh, I didn't know that this is possible.  I was told that one has to "generate default privileges" after installing a new corpus, which we have been doing since for every new corpus, leading to a horrible proliferation of sets of privileges on our CQPweb server.

I clearly need a better CQPweb administrator. :-)

Best,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
CWB mailing list
CWB at sslmit.unibo.it<mailto:CWB at sslmit.unibo.it>
http://liste.sslmit.unibo.it/mailman/listinfo/cwb



--
Jiayue Wang
College of Foreign Studies
Guangxi University for Nationalties
Nanning, China 530006
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://liste.sslmit.unibo.it/pipermail/cwb/attachments/20171003/5c4daba9/attachment.html>